Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 1:22:28 GMT -6
Fake news, false posts, misinformation on Facebook. We encounter these terms more and more often. According to the STEM survey, 25% of Czech residents believe misinformation and cite social networks as their primary source of information. How to recognize such posts? And to what extent can they influence people's thinking and decision-making? Thanks to social networks, we can be connected with friends in real time anywhere in the world. But their dark side also emerges. Hoaxes and false news spread very quickly through social media and are increasingly interfering with people's real-life decisions. image We got such a mess here 2017 was a difficult year for Facebook, fake news or untrue information that influences users' thinking is coming to the fore.
Sharing them has never B2B Email List been easier. All this is supported by social bubbles that arise on the networks. The Facebook algorithm is adapted to show us those posts (pages, friends, groups) that we are likely to like the most . Many users are unable to evaluate the issue objectively, they are surrounded by the same opinions that only confirm theirs. The analysis of Lidové noviny represents the social bubbles of the Czechs, from where supporters of individual parties receive information. image Czechs in captivity of social bubbles, source: www.lidovky.cz/bubliny.aspx Facebook has long been used not only to communicate with your friends, but rather to browse the content of media, pages or groups. While before we mainly saw photos of cute babies and what someone had for lunch in the feed, today social networks are a driving force in influencing social opinion .
Mark, we have a problem Users receive only those messages that they agree with and no longer verify whether the information is substantiated and true. In addition, there are more and more users who draw information only from social networks. A survey by Czech Radio revealed that the 20 most shared news from news sources received 4% fewer interactions than news from disinformation websites , where the authors are mostly anonymous. All this contributes to the rapid and unlimited sharing of fake news on social networks. According to a survey by Socialbakers, 87% of such messages are links , 10% photos and 3% videos. One of the other causes of the spread of fake news is the rapid decline in the income of media houses . This decline, as can be seen from the graph below, started around 2004, when Facebook was launched.
Sharing them has never B2B Email List been easier. All this is supported by social bubbles that arise on the networks. The Facebook algorithm is adapted to show us those posts (pages, friends, groups) that we are likely to like the most . Many users are unable to evaluate the issue objectively, they are surrounded by the same opinions that only confirm theirs. The analysis of Lidové noviny represents the social bubbles of the Czechs, from where supporters of individual parties receive information. image Czechs in captivity of social bubbles, source: www.lidovky.cz/bubliny.aspx Facebook has long been used not only to communicate with your friends, but rather to browse the content of media, pages or groups. While before we mainly saw photos of cute babies and what someone had for lunch in the feed, today social networks are a driving force in influencing social opinion .
Mark, we have a problem Users receive only those messages that they agree with and no longer verify whether the information is substantiated and true. In addition, there are more and more users who draw information only from social networks. A survey by Czech Radio revealed that the 20 most shared news from news sources received 4% fewer interactions than news from disinformation websites , where the authors are mostly anonymous. All this contributes to the rapid and unlimited sharing of fake news on social networks. According to a survey by Socialbakers, 87% of such messages are links , 10% photos and 3% videos. One of the other causes of the spread of fake news is the rapid decline in the income of media houses . This decline, as can be seen from the graph below, started around 2004, when Facebook was launched.